Australia’s rising compliance bill

Batteground-Australias-rising-compliance-bill

2 minute read

Australia’s Compliance Price Tag Is Now Too Big to Ignore

Australia’s regulatory bill has exploded, complying with Commonwealth rules alone now costs businesses an estimated AUD 160 billion a year, or 5.8% of GDP, according to Mandala Partners’ 2025 analysis of federal regulatory complexity. At the same time, analysts forecast the Australian RegTech market will grow from roughly AUD 623.7 million in 2025 to more than AUD 4 billion by the mid‑2030s, as organisations turn to technology and AI to keep pace without endlessly adding headcount.

Why Manual Compliance Is Hitting Its Limits

Behind those numbers is a simple problem: most compliance effort is still manual. Studies of Australian financial institutions suggest larger firms are spending around AUD 27.6 million each year on financial crime compliance alone, with more than half of that going to staff and training to keep up with AML and related rules. It is not surprising, then, that both regulators and boards are pushing for smarter, more data‑driven approaches that maintain (and prove) good conduct without drowning teams in spreadsheets.

How AI‑Powered RegTech Turns Rules into Action

This is where modern RegTech, and especially AI enabled tools, come in. Explainers from McKinsey and others describe how these systems can read complex regulations and policies, break them into clear obligations, and link each obligation to specific risks, controls, incidents and owners so organisations can show how they comply in practice. Battleground’s RAiDAR AI, for example, is designed to extract “discrete, actionable requirements from complex source material” and connect them directly to operational controls, processes, policies and accountability statements, with every requirement still checked and approved by a human before it becomes active.

Keeping Humans in Charge of the Machines

That last point is crucial: compliance is not being handed over to machines. Instead, AI does the heavy lifting of structuring information, while professionals stay firmly in charge of interpretation, approvals and explaining decisions to regulators and boards. And by embedding obligations into the same environment that tracks risks, controls and incidents, as Battleground’s Compliance Module does, compliance health becomes a live view of what’s actually happening, not a backwards‑looking spreadsheet updated every quarter.​

Ready to Rethink Compliance? Speak to the Team at Battleground

If you want to explore how this kind of AI enabled, human in the loop approach could reduce manual effort while strengthening accountability in your own risk and compliance framework, speak to the team at Battleground to understand what’s possible in your environment.

Share this article with your network